Welcome to our forum. A Message To Our New and Prospective Members . Check out our Forum Rules. Lets keep this forum an enjoyable place to visit.
Private messaging is working again.








Regular advisor
Regulars

I was curious in regards to how many people on fiddlerman forums have Absolute/perfect pitch.
For those that don't know, people with perfect pitch have the ability to hear a note, and then say its letter name without any preference (hearing a C or any other note, and then using it to figure out the note).
There is another similar ability that's called relative pitch, it's the ability to identify pitches related to the notes you've heard. With relative pitch, you can identify notes related to each other. You can identify notes using a preference (usually a C).
I have perfect pitch myself, I was even born with it.
I made a poll to record how many members have perfect pitch/relative pitch.
Do you have Perfect Pitch?
- No, I have relative pitch instead.
- No, I don't have relative pitch, or perfect pitch.
- Yes!!!!

This question raises another aspect that's interesting ( to me ) - so - not meaning to hijack your thread in any way - I may open this up for discussion here since it is related....
It is generally understood ( so I have read ), that notes - played in isolation - perhaps up to 5-to-10 or so cents "away" ( high or low ) from a specific 'pitch' (be it A 440Hz or C 261.6Hz or any other standard equal temperament note) are generally not recognized as being "out-of-tune".
This is often referred to as the "JND" ( just noticeable difference ). What will be heard, if a second instrument plays the PRECISE pitch will be a "beating" effect between the two apparently-the-same notes.
I've messed with this using Audacity to set up various tones - it is very subjective - especially because I know exactly what I'm supposed to be listening for - and I would say that - for tones in isolation (played one after the other) - I start to recognize them as being "different" at around 10 cents away from each other - about 1/10th of a semitone. It should also be noted that in this simple series of tests I ran, I stuck with simple sine waves. More complex waveforms containing numerous overtones as would normally be heard, may well give a different result. BUT - I can only differentiate them if I hear one immediately after the other - on their own - I could never tell which was high, which was low, or indeed which if any was perfect.
The other thing that relates to this are when multiple instruments, especially fret-less are playing the same sequence of notes. That's where the "interesting" overall sound of multiple instruments comes from - no-one in a violin section of an orchestra is 100% repeatedly hitting the precise frequency of a given pitch (they will generally be some cents out, high or low, and although they appear to be visually 'in-time' with each other - there will always be minor differences in timing as well. (Besides, they'll hide it with vibrato )
I think this is what (or one of the things that) gives an orchestrated piece its richness and interest. If all the players were in exact-pitch with each other and in and exact phase relationship ( time ) - you might as well have a number of robots playing...
The other related aspect that comes to mind is the difference between pitches defined in the (compromise) Equal Temperament tuning, and those in the Just Intonation tuning scheme - but I'm not going there right now LOL
LOL - @Elwin - I wasn't questioning your ability in any way - I just find it really interesting, and how "accurate" perfect-pitch can be, especially with a single tone, played in isolation of any other cues.... Thanks for the post - I like topics like this which make me stop and think, and pose questions to myself !
EDIT: For relative pitch ear-training - check out https://fiddlerman.com/fiddle-.....tion-game/
I seriously recommend not copying my mistakes. D'oh -
Please make your own, different mistakes, and help us all learn :-)

Regular advisor
Regulars

Well, it's important to know, that the perfect pitch ability is pretty "general". What a note that violinists/violists call C, another musician might call D. It's because instruments such as the Clarinet and Trumpet are transposing to B-flat. So note preferences might be different.
Also, throughout history, A=440 wasn't the standard. During baroque times, A=415 (A-flat in today's pitches) was a common one. However, France tended to use A=392 (G in today's pitches). Some cities used A=466, I think, usually higher than A=440. A=440 wasn't used as the standard until much later.
Several orchestras usually tune to an A=442, because it helps with projection. My sister did tune her violin to A=442 once, and it did sound better, a little. Though I did notice that it sounded a bit "Sharp".
I never meant that perfect pitch means that you can detect sharp or flat. Usually, with training, all musicians can detect that. I just meant, distinguishing individual notes, or "telling them apart by their rich 'color'". People with perfect pitch tend to view notes that way, sort of like "hearing colors".
And, it's completely fine to be discussing this on this thread. You're not hijacking it.

Elwin said
....And, it's completely fine to be discussing this on this thread. You're not hijacking it.
LOL ! Thank you - I tend to do that !
Yeah - thanks for the feedback - I understand the differences in tuning, and transposing instruments. I actually like the sound on one of my fiddles better when its tuning is dropped by a semitone - so that's great for playing it on its own (so although I'm playing a tune scored in D, it's coming out as being in C# LOL. Even then, it's no great problem to play along to accompaniment that's really in D - although it does initially "mess my fingering up" Hahaha
I never meant that perfect pitch means that you can detect sharp or flat. Usually, with training, all musicians can detect that. I just meant, distinguishing individual notes, or "telling them apart by their rich 'color'". People with perfect pitch tend to view notes that way, sort of like "hearing colors".
Ahhh, I understand much better ! That particular association, I do not have - although I do tend to "hear music in my head" - obviously not an "auditory" process, and I'm not actually "hearing" any particular sound, or instrument voice - I can't really explain it. I guess it's not unusual though.
I seriously recommend not copying my mistakes. D'oh -
Please make your own, different mistakes, and help us all learn :-)

I certainly don't have anything resembling perfect pitch.
My professor in college up in his 70's life long teacher, pianist, ect. said that it used to be really really rare. He had still only encountered a few in his long life.
I know people that claim to have almost perfect pitch.
Interesting discussion for sure.
Vibrato Desperato.... Desperately seeking vibrato

Regular advisor
Regulars

It is quite rare that someone has real perfect pitch, nevertheless, one who was born with it. It does, however, come with a few downsides.
From what I've heard, people with perfect pitch tend to have trouble with sight reading. I'm a bit skeptical about that since I can sightread, it's just that sightreading on the piano was pretty hard. I can always tell if I'm making a mistake, and it bothered me. My teacher was always saying "don't correct yourself while sight reading". On a different instrument, it's easier.
Also, having perfect pitch would mean a different level of criticalness. You can tell when they're not playing the notes right, or their intonation needs work on, and many times, that would cause others to distance themselves from you. On the bottom line, you hear music differently than everyone else around you.
One thing I'd also like to add, there are times, when there are three, wind or string instruments playing a triad, e.g. C-E-G, many times the chord would sound better if all three weren't "in-tune". The E (or 3rd) would sound better if it was slightly flat, while the G (or 5th) would sound better if it is slightly sharp. The C (or root) has to be spot on. You combine those three intonations, and the chord sounds better. We did that many times while I was in band.

Regulars

Elwin said
.......One thing I'd also like to add, there are times, when there are three, wind or string instruments playing a triad, e.g. C-E-G, many times the chord would sound better if all three weren't "in-tune". The E (or 3rd) would sound better if it was slightly flat, while the G (or 5th) would sound better if it is slightly sharp. The C (or root) has to be spot on. You combine those three intonations, and the chord sounds better. We did that many times while I was in band.
Couldn't agree more ! I hear the difference.... What you say is corroborated by the math - and - we understand why Just Intonation "works for the ear", but, equally, why the equal temperament scale is no more than a (very necessary) compromise in our 12-semi-tone scale..... And, arguably (just for the sake of being awkward here - LOL) the Justly Intoned C E G is the one that's "in-tune" and it's the Eq. Temp. C E G that's not !!!!
Interval |
Note
(for example) |
Ratio to Fundamental Just Scale |
Ratio to Fundamental Equal Temperament |
Unison | C | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
Minor Second | C# | 25/24 = 1.0417 | 1.05946 |
Major Second | D | 9/8 = 1.1250 | 1.12246 |
Minor Third | D# | 6/5 = 1.2000 | 1.18921 |
Major Third | E | 5/4 = 1.2500 | 1.25992 |
Fourth | F | 4/3 = 1.3333 | 1.33483 |
Diminished Fifth | F# | 45/32 = 1.4063 | 1.41421 |
Fifth | G | 3/2 = 1.5000 | 1.49831 |
Minor Sixth | G# | 8/5 = 1.6000 | 1.58740 |
Major Sixth | A | 5/3 = 1.6667 | 1.68179 |
Minor Seventh | A# | 9/5 = 1.8000 | 1.78180 |
Major Seventh | B | 15/8 = 1.8750 | 1.88775 |
Octave | C | 2.0000 | 2.0000 |
Playing a chord C, E, G in Just Intonation as distinct from the fixed pitch compromise that is Equal Temperament - suggests exactly what you say. If you were all playing in Equal temperament then, flattening the E slightly, and sharpening the G slightly definitely brings the chord closer to the justly-intoned (and nicer to the ear) version.
I seriously recommend not copying my mistakes. D'oh -
Please make your own, different mistakes, and help us all learn :-)

Regulars
Just a small point, but I believe there are very few people who don't have either absolute or relative pitch. Almost everyone has relative pitch. Those who don't are sometimes referred to as 'tone deaf' and are unable to differentiate between different pitches, even if played one after the other. A very rare thing, if I understand it correctly.
My understanding is that even tone deaf people can differentiate pitches from one another if they're far enough apart, so even then it's all, er, relative.


Advanced member


Regular advisor
Regulars

True tone deafness is really rare. True tone deafness, can't even distinguish a "high-pitch" from a low pitch, even if the pitch isn't a musical note. You know those "slide whistles". You "slide up" and "slide down" it's going to sound like a continuous sound to a tone deaf person.
There are those people that say they are tone deaf: but they claim "I can't hear my own tone". If you can hear and distinguish tones, or at least spot a difference, then you aren't, it's just that you need a lot more training in music to get your ears used to it.
Having relative pitch, does help in bluegrass. I also play the upright bass a little, and you do need to be able to improvise at music such as bluegrass.

Regular advisor
Regulars

There is a theory, though, that musicians with absolute/perfect pitch are in tune to just hearing pitches like that. They have scanned the brains, and musicians who display perfect pitch have unusually large temporal lobes.
I do believe that people can be trained to have perfect pitch, though, it might be impossible for some.

Regulars
1 Guest(s)

