Welcome to our forum. A Message To Our New and Prospective Members . Check out our Forum Rules. Lets keep this forum an enjoyable place to visit.
Private messaging is working again.









This is just a quick comparison video I made comparing my $60 Fiberglass bow that came with my outfit with the $200 Holstein Pernambuco bow I just got from Fiddlershop.
I refrained from posting this in the review section, since it's not really a review, more of just a sound sample
Let me know how you think the Holstein bow sounds compared to the fiberglass.

Honorary tenured advisor
Regulars

Regulars
I would vote for the Holstein bow. For me, wood generally has a slightly more rounded and softer tone as compared to composites in the bows I've heard, although I haven't played any of the high end composites, so I can only comment on the lower end of those.
I have a Fiddlerman bow and a few others including the "incredibow" . I had the incredibow sent with a fake wood finish so I wouldn't think about it not being wood ;). I notice the same things your recording picked up in most wood/composite comparisons. The high end composites at 1k and above is probably whole different ballgame in composite bows.

Regulars
To me, there's no comparison between the Holstein and the fiberglass bow; the Holstein sounds much better even on my tinny laptop speakers.
@starise, there's a huge difference between fiberglass and carbon fiber. Carbon fiber bows are competitive with wood bows, IMO. They don't sound as warm, but in the $200-$1000 range they are as responsive as wood bows as much as 5 times their price. Fiberglass bows are most often found in low-end student violin outfits. I remember finding even the cheapest brazilwood bows (under $50) to be superior to the borrowed fiberglass bow I started with.
1 Guest(s)

