Welcome to our forum. A Message To Our New and Prospective Members . Check out our Forum Rules. Lets keep this forum an enjoyable place to visit.
Private messaging is working again.








Regulars
When i first started to learn the fiddle i 'interviewed' a couple of potential teachers.
the first that knocked on my door turned up 'bear footed'. In the part of Australia that I live in is not all that unusual. But she then said that she 'forgot' to bring her violin.
She forgot 'WHAT'?????
Fortunately at that time I had 2 violins and gave her on to use. He then proceeded to show me how good she was on ' my'' violin.
Do you think that she was ever 'employed' as my teacher??
Seen it all. Done it all. Can't remember most of ..... What was I saying????

Pro advisor
Regulars

Regular advisor
Regulars


Pro advisor
Regulars
Unfortunately playing well doesnt guarantee that person can also communicate how to duplicate that in the student. Also, not all good teachers play at a high level. For my part at least I am completely upfront and honest with all my students from the get go. They know they arent getting a pro at all. But, the first lesson is free and if we have a good rapport and they feel comfortable proceeding, we usually carry on. I also only take on rank beginners as well.
This also translates to the student however, I have met teachers who dont take beginners and any hopefuls must audition for them. What a nerve racking process that must be.
"Please play some wrong notes, so that we know that you are human" - said to Jascha Heifetz.

Members

Well, I suppose at least part of it still depends on how well she played. Ok, so if you want to consider her one point down on the score for not actually bringing her violin, that's cool, but it doesn't mean she couldn't teach some, or that she was always that unprepared.
As Pf points out, someone playing good is no guarantee at all that they can teach well.. But.. I seriously don't believe that a teacher is likely to be able to teach any better than they themselves can play. If the teacher doesn't sound at least partway to where you'd like to be, it would be my belief that they can't help you much, if any at all.
So far as the barefooted bit.. Well, some people like a teacher to be kinda formal and some would be more comfortable with a more "hair down" casual style of teacher. Depends on what the student can respect.
"This young wine may have a lot of tannins now, but in 5 or 10 years it is going to be spectacular, despite the fact that right now it tastes like crude oil. You know this is how it is supposed to taste at this stage of development." ~ Itzhak Perlman

Regulars

Regulars
Fiddlerman said
What's the verdict though Ferret?
How do you use the 'poll' feature.
The girl that I have teaching me occasionally now is much more professional and is not only a violinist, she is also a 'Fiddle' player.
Seen it all. Done it all. Can't remember most of ..... What was I saying????

Regulars
Fiddlestix said
I have a hard enough time teaching the one student I do have, let alone three or four or more to add to the confusion.
@fiddlestix
Fair enough Ken. But with that 'one' do you wear your shoes and have your own fiddle?
Seen it all. Done it all. Can't remember most of ..... What was I saying????

lol, John,, it really doesn't matter if I wear any clothe's at all because that "one" student happen's to be "me".
I learned year's ago from one of my first employer's that if I'm telling / teaching someone how to do something that I'd better be sure I was able to give a proper demonstration how it should be done correctly. One doesn't teach school unless they are qualified.
And I am "not" just kidding about this.
KAJ.
Regulars


Members

A teacher doesn't have to know everything. I feel they do need to be able to demonstrate that they have some things you want to learn, though. But sometimes one can work with a particular teacher just to get one part of a skill-set, or even a single technique, and it can be worthwhile.
Years ago I was playing in a rock/metal band, and there was this kid who'd only been playing for maybe 6 months in one of the new bands. All he did was rhythm, but.. He as faster than me. Only been playing 6 months and I'd been playing for years, but his 6 months had been learning to play speedmetal/thrash.
So I contacted him and arranged a time to get some lesson/pointers. LOL It was great fun. It just took some tricks I hadn't seen before and doing things I normally did a bit different and then I knew how it was done. A couple of weeks of working it in practice and it was in my skill set. he was a great new player, serious about what he was doing, and he was working hard at getting good. I didn't let the fact that I'd been playing about as long as he'd been alive keep me from taking a lesson from him. LOL
Sure, I knew a lot more about guitar than he did. But he could do one thing I didn't know how to do yet, and so it was worth taking a lesson from him and insisting he take pay for it. Because hey, it was worth it to *me*. LOL
So a teacher doesn't have to know everything, just some stuff you want. So far as "qualified"? Well, I don't know what the qualifications would be other than "knows how to do some stuff I don't know yet but want to know". I don't know as I'd have any real idea how to tell if someone was qualified to teach some useful music or not.
When you've learned what one teacher can teach you, you look for the next one. Learning music and how to play is something I think of as an ongoing process, without end. There's new tricks and sounds being developed every day, and new music being written. That's part of what makes it fun!
"This young wine may have a lot of tannins now, but in 5 or 10 years it is going to be spectacular, despite the fact that right now it tastes like crude oil. You know this is how it is supposed to taste at this stage of development." ~ Itzhak Perlman
1 Guest(s)

