Welcome to our forum. A Message To Our New and Prospective Members . Check out our Forum Rules. Lets keep this forum an enjoyable place to visit.
Currently working on getting badges to show up horizontally. Should hopefully figure that out within a week. Thanks for your patience.

Sign in with 3rd Party Account
Sign in with Site Password








Regulars



The more interesting question is how does the average income of a violinist reflect the devotion to quality manufacturers are willing to invest.
Because the average salary for a violinist is about 30 cents an hour, the demand for the highest quality instruments is low....that's why you dont see many universities offering degrees in luthiery.
Mass production then becomes the only option for the investor and the masses. Hense, the sum total for materials used in the manufacture of an average violin is about 30 cents. Add to that labor and distribution.

Pro advisor
Regulars
There's always a way to make money with music dash. When you feel sad inside that's a great time to write a song. Many different ways to make money with music. The average pay for violinists in California is about $100 thousand a year and there is jobs available... Think movie scores, background music for videos games, commercials... The list goes on. And the violin is a popular instrument out here. I don't understand about 30 cents an hour? That's enough to make a living though in some countries.
Musical instruments are one of the few things that go up in value these days and their is plenty of investors. I promised FM though no more rants... I will just go hit my speed bag instead of ranting on his forum Gonna go hit my speed bag then get back to practice

Honorary advisor
Regulars
dashrem said
Hehe
I'm just curious as to how much a good quality violin would cost to make on materials alone. Not labor or branding or age or etc etc.
You can get a nice wood package at Grandpa's Workshop for about US $75. Another US $50 or so for fittings, another US $30-60 for strings, add a bow and case if you're so inclined, and you're ready to play.
Kits are another answer that has been covered in this forum.
The real cost for a "bench made" fiddle is in labor and the experience of a good luthier should not come nearly as cheap as it does.
Mary in Springfield, Oregon http://www.thefiddleandbanjopr.....dpress.com

Honorary tenured advisor
Regulars

Luthier made violins don't come cheap! Heck I was not able to see a single online price here. They present the types of violins they make and you have to contact them for prices who vary a lot depending on what fittings you want etc. usually a couple thousands to many.
"It can sing like a bird, it can cry like a human being, it can be very angry, it can be all that humans are" Maxim Vengerov

myguitarnow said
The average pay for violinists in California is about $100 thousand a year and there is jobs available... Think movie scores, background music for videos games, commercials... The list goes on. And the violin is a popular instrument out here. I don't understand about 30 cents an hour? That's enough to make a living though in some countries.Musical instruments are one of the few things that go up in value these days and their is plenty of investors. I promised FM though no more rants... I will just go hit my speed bag instead of ranting on his forum
Gonna go hit my speed bag then get back to practice
Talent is a comodity (for the professional) and the development of the comodity takes learning and practice......thousands of hours of learning and practice for which the barer usually receives not a single cent....to the contrary...the barer must pay; books....teacher....internet....instrument....paraphanalia...travel....etc. Work it out for yourself; all the time one devotes to the maintenance of talent, and in actuality you'll come to the conclusion that a majority loose money; the talent is then relagated to amateur or hobby status and the barer waits tables.
100,000 a year....yeah, right...you have a better chance of flying to the moon....good luck!
There is one thing more plentiful than out of work actors.....and that's out of work musicians.

Pro advisor
Regulars
True Joe. Sorta... You can't expect to get too good and make a living playing an hour a day. You have to practice all day long almost everyday and yep, you can make $100,000 a day if you're serious. Or just play music as a hobby cause you love music and get a day job to make your living. I would not be able to support my family and lifestyle on $100,000 a year. Lets not start a a text fight again. PLEASE!!!! No flying to the moon anytime soon for me, I'm kind of afraid of flying.

myguitarnow said
Lets not start a a text fight again. PLEASE!!!! No flying to the moon anytime soon for me, I'm kind of afraid of flying.
My mistake...I didnt have my glasses on and I thought at first glance that NV had provided the previous comment. I should not have used 3 seconds of thought to respond otherwise.

cdennyb said
@Joe: Did you know there's a university in Utah that has a specialized course in Luthier work...
There's another school in Oregon as well but I dont know the details on that one.
Yes I did...that's why I said; "...you dont see many universities offering degrees..."
I'm not here to deminish anyones dreams....but there are those who bet their dreams against fantastic odds, such as inner city kids who base their entire youth on playing for the Lakers or acquiring 10 seconds of fame on a talent show .....chances are it aint gonna happen...and so the kid's education suffers and job opportunities are seldom enhanced beyond the golden arches or wally world.

Members





joe said
There is one thing more plentiful than out of work actors.....and that's out of work musicians.
Surely you jest, Joe! There is no such thing as an "out of work musician". We always have plenty of work, there's always a technique or song to be working on, or someone somewhere who will listen.
It is just the "getting paid for it" part that can be a bit challenging sometimes.
I read in an interview once, I think it was Jimmy page saying something about how if music was something you think you might want to go into as a career, it is a really lousy way of making a living. But if music is something you HAVE to do, it can be a pretty good life.
"This young wine may have a lot of tannins now, but in 5 or 10 years it is going to be spectacular, despite the fact that right now it tastes like crude oil. You know this is how it is supposed to taste at this stage of development." ~ Itzhak Perlman

joe said
The more interesting question is how does the average income of a violinist reflect the devotion to quality manufacturers are willing to invest.
Because the average salary for a violinist is about 30 cents an hour, the demand for the highest quality instruments is low....that's why you dont see many universities offering degrees in luthiery.
Joe, what do you concider an average violinist ?
And is the $00.30 per hour for the average violin maker in China or the average violinist in a symphony ?

Fiddlestix said
Joe, what do you concider an average violinist ?
And is the $00.30 per hour for the average violin maker in China or the average violinist in a symphony ?
That's a funny question....but Ill try to respond.
For every employed violinist in the symphony there are 160 aspiring violinists that are doing something other than play their fiddle to make a living. Divide that generous 100,000 dollar a year salary by 161 and you get $621 each. There about 260 working days in the year, that's 2080 working hours. That works out to be about 30 cents an hour average wage for the 161 violinists.
Now, do you want to be the one luthier who sells one violin every 3 to 5 years to that symphony musician, or do you want to mass produce playable violins and sell to the other 160 who cant afford an expensive fiddle.

Regulars


I think your maths has a flaw, Joe.
You can only average the salary of earning violinists, as if they aren't earning they aren't an earning violinist, if you see what I mean.
I think you need to take into account the varying salaries of earning violinists then average that out into the number of violinists who are earning.
That then becomes the average salary of a earning violinist (who is earning).
I am amazed at how old people of my age are.....

TerryT said
I think your maths has a flaw, Joe.
You can only average the salary of earning violinists, as if they aren't earning they aren't an earning violinist, if you see what I mean.
I think you need to take into account the varying salaries of earning violinists then average that out into the number of violinists who are earning.
That then becomes the average salary of a earning violinist (who is earning).
I dont think so....I am a commercial pilot not earning anything in that capacity, however, I am included in the national statistics for average commercial pilot income. Just because a violinist is not working does not erase them from the charts. That means you prefer to disenfranchise musicians just because they are not working. I wonder what the musicians union would say about that.

Honorary tenured advisor
Regulars

A subway earning would make me happy if it means playing the violin for a living! The bump here is: for a living HAHA... not sure subway coins can pay the rent or the bills. *sighs* back to accounting studies... no wait it's weekend I can play all my heart!
"It can sing like a bird, it can cry like a human being, it can be very angry, it can be all that humans are" Maxim Vengerov

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2.....-o10.shtml
I think you are mixing apples and oranges on this topic.
This can apply to just about any profession, including writer's. It's just a matter of the rate of unemployment and people seeking work.
Above is an article/interview with a member of the Detroit Symphony Orchestra, re: pay scale, musician's waiting for fill in position's etc....
It's a back and forth rat race
1 Guest(s)

