Check out our Forum Rules. Lets keep this forum an enjoyable place to visit.
Well, I've Finally got my search for a new violin for me and my brother down to 2.
I is traditional so I'm not posting it, but the second is very unique.
Made to look like a Uke, but is an electric violin.
I know you don't have many details, but based on the design, does this look like it could be practical, or more just for unique design?
Any thoughts are appreciated as I have to place my order asap.
Okay.... I can't figure out how to add a photo, so I have to use a link to ebay.
Hope that's ok.
Kevin, I dont follow you?? that notch doesnt really cradle the thumb, rather tucks in the spot between thumb and index finger, which I think the wings on the head of the electric does the same idea?
what about the Headless electrics? some pretty famous ones where the pegs are on the bottom of the violin, you know? no notch there.
is it really a problem ??
The problem with non-standard instruments isn't that they can't sound good or work well. But if you are early in the learning process, most of the advice or tutorials you find will be assuming that you have a reasonably standard instrument.
This one being missing a standard "landmark" that folks use to confirm that their hand is in the right place could make it more challenging to learn on. If your ear was already a bit developed and your intonation was good, it might not be so bad.
My thought would be that headstock has not only some metal, but a bit more wood than a standard violin "scroll" that would likely mean the weight and balance would also be different.
Another hint that the design may not have been so much well thought out as being different just to be different are the tailpiece fine tuners. On an instrument with geared tuning machines, fine tuners wouldn't usually actually be necessary. We don't know if they are there because people ask for them if they are left off, or because the thing drifts out of tune a lot.
Getting a shoulder rest to fit it or if you decide a different chinrest might be more comfortable, you're likely to run into some problems with that body shape.
Now, the vendor claims that many people use it to win competitions. So maybe contact the vendor and see if they can give you some links with some footage showing it being played or sound samples so you can hear what it sounds like? Maybe some websites of people where you can hear their playing and where they talk about what they like about this particular style of instrument?
Still, though, if you really like the style, 95$ isn't that much, when it comes to musical instruments. If it ended up being the worst musical equipment mistake you made in your life, you'd have gotten off pretty easy. On the other hand, who knows? It might be pretty sweet in person and actually play well.
But if you're looking for a recommendation for a beginner instrument, I tend to side with Kevin that for most folks, sticking close to standard shapes and etc is likely to save you some grief. If you already know how to play and you try something odd-shaped and it works out for you, that's kind of a different situation.
"This young wine may have a lot of tannins now, but in 5 or 10 years it is going to be spectacular, despite the fact that right now it tastes like crude oil. You know this is how it is supposed to taste at this stage of development." ~ Itzhak Perlman
the LINK is at the start of this thread. Same seller, just click on VIOLINS on the left side menu, not electric violins.
it's the lowest price one in the list, on sale for $65
however, it is all ebony and no inlaid fingerboard. that is a bit of custom work im getting done to it (I've dealt with him before and got custom before)
very accomodating though. and nice work so far.
Most Users Ever Online: 231
Currently Online: MoonShadows
Currently Browsing this Page:
Kevin M.: 1969
Guest Posters: 2
Newest Members:adrianrj69, kristina16, mercedesnm18, Pavlyukachuryic, sidneyjn1, Woodhamchuryic
Administrators: Fiddlerman: 14138, KindaScratchy: 1732, coolpinkone: 4168, BillyG: 2781, MrsFiddlerman: 0, Jimmie Bjorling: 0, SimplePressHelp: 0