Welcome to our forum. A Message To Our New and Prospective Members . Check out our Forum Rules. Lets keep this forum an enjoyable place to visit.
Private messaging is working again.








Regulars

Well I haven't tried all those strings but that's a really neat idea for gauging each string set. It would be fun to do that with personal instruments as the strings are expiramented with so you could keep track of it and mayhap choose the strings that were what you wanted for what types of music you were playing say classical vs. celtic and such. Thank you for sharing.
Lead me, Follow me, or get out of my way!
~General George S. Patton

Interesting analyses and observations @hermes and a well thought-out diagram.
Like many others, I've seen varying descriptions of different strings - and it eventually becomes confusing, especially when personal preferences and specific instruments are used, and attempting to differentiate terms such as "warm" and "mellow" and so on...
I like that way of doing it, especially the concept of overtone production.
Thanks for the info !
I seriously recommend not copying my mistakes. D'oh -
Please make your own, different mistakes, and help us all learn :-)

rockinglr33 said
Well I haven't tried all those strings but that's a really neat idea for gauging each string set. It would be fun to do that with personal instruments as the strings are expiramented with so you could keep track of it and mayhap choose the strings that were what you wanted for what types of music you were playing say classical vs. celtic and such. Thank you for sharing.
@RockingLR33 You mean, to create a chart for each instrument? Actually it would be nice, and some useful info indeed. Regarding your thoughts about the genre, I thought that I could tint areas of the chart with certain colors, regarding to different music genres...soon I hope
BillyG said
Interesting analyses and observations @Hermes and a well thought-out diagram.
Like many others, I've seen varying descriptions of different strings - and it eventually becomes confusing, especially when personal preferences and specific instruments are used, and attempting to differentiate terms such as "warm" and "mellow" and so on...
I like that way of doing it, especially the concept of overtone production.
Thanks for the info
@BillyG Thank you for your comment...These attempts and the whole mess with personal preferences led me to this chart. In the future I hope that I can add steel core strings as well (which I haven't used for a long time - mainly Helicore, Piranito and Chromcore, so I did not remember the results) and gut core (which I have never used...and I should I guess haha). Also I try to thing of a way to make the chart interractive, so anybody (from the forum for example) could mark their thought and create their own charts...It would be fun to compare the results and the opinions...

Regulars

I love how visually pleasing your chart is. It would make a great poster! I like seeing the sound "bloom" -"The size of the external circle"
Violinist start date - May 2013
Fiddler start date - May 2014
FIDDLE- Gift from a dear friend. A 1930-40 german copy, of a french copy of a Stradivarius. BOW - $50 carbon fiber. Strings - Dominants with E Pirastro Gold string.

Honorary tenured advisor
Regulars

Really one of the best and most innovative ideas for expressing string attributes in chart form that I've ever seen. Well done. I would like to see more strings added to the chart, such as the Larson strings. It would be ideal if those attributes were easier to objectively identify, such as through frequency analysis for example, rather than subjectively. Although, I admit that, in the end, it is only by the subjective qualities that our ears prefer one string brand over another.
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort. ~Herm Albright

@Schaick Thank you...feel free to make a poster out of it..."the sound bloom" that can really describe the external circles...
@Fiddlerman I would definitely like to add the Fiddlerman Strings in the chart (I have sent you a PM) , and maybe add a little more info on the chart itself, so it could be interpreted without this whole text I wrote in my first post of this topic. Feel free to use it
@Uzi non quantitive /numerical analysis is indeed a flaw of this chart...I have never done a frequency analysis on strings before, so my "results" were indeed subjective. But it would be great to find a way to combine all these, and maybe give some explanation to what we perceive as a certain quality X or a quality Z etc....

Fiddlerman said
I imagine that you are open to changes and your chart will change a lot as time goes by. Doing something like this is difficult without being able to change from one set to another quickly and as you mentioned, having a machine to analyze both the volume and the sound wave/frequencies...
I think it's really cool though.
Fiddlerman Strings are on their way.
Of course I am open to changes (and that's the point of the possibility of making the chart interactive - maybe flash could do the trick). However if you want it for the website and soon, let me know of your thoughts and what to change anytime
Thank you very much, I'll review them as soon as they arrive
1 Guest(s)

