Welcome to our forum. A Message To Our New and Prospective Members . Check out our Forum Rules. Lets keep this forum an enjoyable place to visit.
Check out our 2023 Group Christmas Project HERE
Log In
Register
Home
Topic RSS
(1 votes) 
King
Regulars
Offline
Wow, thank's Terry, i'll save it and watch it tomorrow, Saturday.
If that's Garret as ole Pag, they did a helluva job on makeup.
King
Regulars
Offline
I guess it's not David Garret. Whoever made the movie didn't put much into making it even look like he is playing. But the gal's sure love him, like they loved Elvis.
Regulars
Offline
this is an old european version.
This is not the new re-make with David in it...
and if you watch enough of it you might also think it's a little too racey for this web site! ...and perhaps borderline X rated.
"If you practice with your hands you must practice all day. Practice with your mind and you can accomplish the same amount in minutes." Nathan Milstein
Members
Offline
Yeah. Much as I kinda like seeing Klaus Kinski playing crazy weird people (because he always did that pretty well), so far as "musician movies" go, this wouldn't be one I could recommend to most people.
Other than being a bit racy for the younger folks, I didn't feel it did much to tell the story of Paganini's life or much of any story at all, hardly. As an art movie, it is ok. But it doesn't have much that would interest a musician other than maybe hearing some Paganini pieces that one can hear played better in quite a few places on the net.
I personally like a little more storyline, or at least a bit of tidbits of info about the music or musician. I didn't really feel like I got that from watching this.
It was ok as just entertainment, if a bit excessive on "adult" scenes. But as a musician movie, I couldn't really recommend it.
"This young wine may have a lot of tannins now, but in 5 or 10 years it is going to be spectacular, despite the fact that right now it tastes like crude oil. You know this is how it is supposed to taste at this stage of development." ~ Itzhak Perlman
King
Regulars
Offline
Sorry, Barry. Beside's being old, i'm also confused. 
Although Barry and Terry do sound alike, with only one exception.
Regulars
Offline
I've done exactly the same Ken, Fred!
'sept I haven't yet got old age to contend with lol!
I am amazed at how old people of my age are.....
Offline
Not even worth censoring guys.
"The richest person is not the one who has the most,
but the one who needs the least."
King
Regulars
Offline
You can see worse movie's on Saturday night on the Sundance channel.
Member
Offline
I don't think this is something I would take my wife or 10 year old niece to watch. It's not a good movie, on multiple counts.
Of that portion I could stomach, there was nothing but absurd sexual fantasy, full length nudity, and idol worshiping.
Really now.....if it wasn't worth censoring, then why was it worth posting?
The acting? Not even close to a nominee for an academy trash can.
The music? The audio was horrible; it sounded like it came from an Edison Dictaphone.
It's a smut film through and through; there is no doubt. Probably better suited for degenerate law makers and CIA directors in Washington and Virginia , than for a family website dedicated to musical training and support.
99 % of the people I meet are self absorbed human waste sphincters.
1 % play fiddle
Regulars
Offline
Can't be all bad!
He was using a Fiddlerman carbon fibre bow in his solo at around the 1:07 hour mark!!
I am amazed at how old people of my age are.....
Member
Offline
1:07 hours to find something redeeming.....that's a pretty high pain threshold.
That equates to how many pints?
99 % of the people I meet are self absorbed human waste sphincters.
1 % play fiddle
Regulars
Offline
Cheated! Fast forward is a wonderful invention!
I was only looking at the violin playing sectors
I am amazed at how old people of my age are.....
Members
Offline
The lack of actual content on Paganini's life as a musician and his accomplishments and etc made this a movie that wasn't what I had been hoping for.
Since the movie with David Garrett apparently focuses on the alleged "deal with the devil", I don't expect much better from it either.
I don't care if actors actually play the instruments when portraying a musician. In many cases, it is probably better if they don't, and work instead on playing the character. But a movie about a musician should have more about their music and their work and how they got there. The things that happened in their life and how they got their influences.
To me, whether Paganini or Robert Johnson made some "deal with the devil" isn't particularly interesting. What they did with it, so far as what they learned and played and wrote and what their world was like over their lifetime is what I usually want to see.
"This young wine may have a lot of tannins now, but in 5 or 10 years it is going to be spectacular, despite the fact that right now it tastes like crude oil. You know this is how it is supposed to taste at this stage of development." ~ Itzhak Perlman
Honorary advisor
Regulars
OfflineRegulars
Offline
it won't play here in the usa. copyright blocked.
"If you practice with your hands you must practice all day. Practice with your mind and you can accomplish the same amount in minutes." Nathan Milstein
King
Regulars
Offline
I got the same result as Dennis.
Honorary advisor
Regulars
Offline
dang!....oh well, it's playable for me.
cheers! - ⁰ℨ
Honorary advisor
Regulars
Offline
If music be the food of love, play on;
Give me excess of it ..(William Shakespeare in Twelfth Night)
1 Guest(s)
Mouse
tonyluo
ELCBK
